Increasing the percentage of ruminant emissions over actual figures is exactly what the enviro whackos want the general population of non-questioners to believe. And with more and more cattle operations going to rotational grazing/regenerative ag brings those emissions down to almost zero.

Actually its not at all:

https://www.ted.com/talks/allan_savory_how_to_fight_desertification_and_reverse_climate_change

2/3rds of the earths land surface is desertifying because there isn’t enough cattle. Reinstating cattle would remove all the carbon we have create since the industrial revolution as long as we stop putting more into the atmosphere.

That figure represents ALL agriculture. Livestock accounts for over half of that and cattle represents half of that. If you were to do the math from 14.5% figure that means that cattle represents roughly 3.125% of global GHG (not so scary when you put it that way).

This is the most commonly misrepresented fact circulating the internet. The actual estimate of agricultural GHG ranges from 10-16% depending on what research you read, but the more recent models that have had more accurate accounts for fuel and energy put ag GHG at 11%. Meaning cattle would be more like 2% of all GHG.

I was impressed that they referred to Voison’s early work on rotational grazing (he called it “rational grazing”) from 1959. Joel adopted it an has been a wonderful proponent, but he didn’t invent rotational grazing.